Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Rigor of Beauty

Book I of Paterson starts with what seems like an epigraph:
“Rigor of beauty is the quest. But how will you find beauty when it is locked in the mind past all remonstrance” (3). But who is speaking this? As Lexi pointed out earlier, Paterson is a multivocal text. Yet Williams signals different voices with quotations only rarely. Strangely, the note to the text tells us that this is Williams himself speaking: “WCW’s own prose. On the 1945 KS galleys WCW cut two additional sentences that were also contained within the quotation marks: ‘It is not in the things nearest us unless transposed there by our employment? Make it free, then, by the art you have, to enter these starved and broken pieces’” (253). So, it is perhaps not an epigraph as much as it is an invitation, but it is still unclear why Williams would want to set it off like he does, since he does not use quotes normally in this way; is it merely to create a physical, graphic separation, to literally signify the “locked in the mind past all remonstrance”?
I’m hesitant to buy the explanation of pure graphism here. I still wonder about the way in which these quotes elicit the voice, especially in such a crucial place, the place of beginnings (however much a readerly desire for a beginning is thwarted by Williams), the place of “arma virumque cano” [“of arms and a man I sing”: Vergil]. A reply to the Greek and Latin with the bare hands would get rid of the arma (maybe replacing it with the silk factory or writing itself), but to a certain extent Williams gets rid of the virum and the cano too. What’s left? Que? I think there is definitely some singing left in the midst of the play of things, in the mist of the Passaic falls. After all, the famous line “no ideas but in things” is actually “say it: no ideas but in things.” Not that saying is singing, but saying might be enough of a song in the face of the brute materiality of Paterson (he mentions in his 1951 statement about the poem that it will only be with Book III that the poem will attain language; ironically, this is the book with the mute geological cross-section.)
So is it Williams that suppresses sound in his text or, as Garrett Stewart claims, is it the critics who have suppressed the phonotext of modernist poetry? Perhaps both. For Williams, the white noise of the falls overcomes sound and song, even as they emerge from its cosmogonic chaos. Whatever the song of Paterson is, it is not as easy to hear as in the other modernist epics, where “sounds cut in, rise, then fade away as other sounds intrude, as if we were tapping into a party line on a municipal phone exchange, spinning down a radio dial, or sampling a stack of records.” (Adelaide Morris)
If anything, the quotes here—as citations go—imply the already-said of past and memory. Whatever is said or sung of the “starved and broken pieces” to come is a function of the present-tense activity of reading (or singing, if you wish to interpret his concretisms lyrically.) The rest lacks citation as if—and this goes even for the archival passages—it hasn’t even been said yet.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

4 Comments:

Blogger sink sink socks said...

Another manifestation of the dream work which all incoherent picture erotik dreams havein common is still more noticeable.Oh, that he were walking down those two planks,drawing a stick across the pickets, lifting high happy feet whichcould turn alte votze in at that gate! He wouldn't care what the lamps said then.But as we sit upon our high stools at the desk oppositeeach other, I leaning upon my elbows and looking at him; he, porni movies withsidelong face, glancing out of the window, as if it commanded aboundless landscape, instead of a dim, dingy office court, I cannotrefrain from saying:Well!He turns slowly, and I go chatting on--a little too loquacious,perhaps, about those young girls.It has already been emphasized by Dugas that busty string Goblet was forced torepudiate many facts in order to generalize his theory.

11:01 PM, December 20, 2006  
Blogger Joe Milutis said...

Spam, you are my Marcia Nardi.

11:06 AM, December 21, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I have been using Advanced Gain Pro for 3 months now and I must say I'm simply amazed. I really didn't think the product would have this many benefits. I really only purchased the pills to help the reliability of my erections. But to my surprise every aspect of my penis and sex life has improved. I have larger, harder erections easily, and I can really satisfy my girlfriend fully now."
Dexter, Chicago

Don't be left behind- enlarge yourself now!

________________________________
Our others products, more info here:
Ultra Allure Pheromones
Anatrim

11:16 AM, December 21, 2006  
Blogger sink sink socks said...

But my fatal eyes, behind bilderhardcorecrack the glasses, followedand entered with him, and saw that the chamber was a chapel.The Major put on his glasses and read the privater rastplatzsex line in the cast ofcharacters that her fingers indicated.Thus the dream facade may show us directly the true core ofthe dream, distorted through password sex admixture with other matter.I contrast the dreamwhich my memory evokes with the dream and other added matter revealed byanalysis: the former dolly buster avi wild gina porno I call the dream's manifest content ; the latter,without at first further subdivision, its latent content.

11:09 PM, January 01, 2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home